Map from: Nature & Leslie et al EuroGeographics, March 2015
Below is a precursor study, which in part links in with the latest research published under : What is Brythonic? Did the Picts speak it? Britain’s native Celtic language explained, coming next.
But first: In late December 2021, an article was published by Journalist Paul Runcorn for the BBC, possibly linking the Celtic lanquage with a large scale prehistoric migration into the island of Britain around nearly 4000 years ago and lasting up to the late 800 BC. The studies suggest that the DNA of many British people are Celtic (Brythonic) in origin. What is interesting is that we know there are two ‘sister’ Celtic languages recognised: Brythonic/Celtic P and Goidelic/Celtic Q.
The former was the language spoken throughout ancient Celtic Britain and the latter is spoken by the Irish and for a couple of hundred years by the highlands and lowland Scots. If you read the links you will see that this linguistic input however, didn’t really encompass the borders whose influence in language was originally Brythonic and influenced more by Anglo-Saxon. The Gaelic lanquage fell out of favour in Scotland, during the reign of Malcolm Canmore, but was mainly retained in the western highlands and islands of Scotland.
Here is a link to the language of the Borders, to include that of our own family, which ties in with other current research.
Interestingly, what this study alludes to is that Goidelic was originally spoken in the island of Britain and was gradually replaced by Brythonic many of thousands of years ago. As such the Goidelic language it seems, may well have transferred from its origins here in Britain into Ireland, rather than being introduced the other way around with the invasion/migration of the Gaels into Western Scotland.
However, further studies continue. Exciting times!
Scientists have uncovered evidence for a large-scale, prehistoric migration into Britain that may be linked to the spread of Celtic languages.
By Paul Rincon
The mass-movement of people originated in continental Europe and occurred between 1,400 BC and 870 BC. The discovery helps to explain the genetic make-up of many present-day people in Britain.
Around half the ancestry of later populations in England and Wales comes from these migrants.
It’s unclear what caused the influx of people during the Middle to Late Bronze Age, but the migrants introduced new ritual practices to Britain.
The results, published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature, are based on DNA extracted from 793 ancient skeletons.
The study reveals that a gene allowing some people to digest raw milk increased rapidly in Britain during the Iron Age – 1,000 years before the same thing happened elsewhere in Northern Europe. It’s an extraordinary example of natural selection for a genetic trait, and the reasons for its spread remain a mystery.
The researchers identified four skeletons at the archaeological sites of Cliffs End Farm and Margetts Pit in Kent, that were either first-generation migrants from continental Europe, or their descendants.
- Ancient Britons ‘replaced’ by newcomers
- Study targets British DNA mystery
- DNA reveals origin of Stonehenge builders
It’s evidence for pioneer settlement of the region from the continent, starting as far back as 1,400BC.
At first, said Dr Thomas Booth, from the Francis Crick Institute in London, people with the new, continental ancestry “appear almost exclusively in Kent… but we don’t really see them anywhere else and we don’t see a change in the overall ancestry of Britain.
But the new DNA signature soon spreads: “From around 1,000BC, suddenly that ancestry seems to disperse all the way through southern Britain, particularly,” he explained, adding: “There’s no particular genetic change in Scotland, but everywhere in England and Wales, this ancestry has an effect.”
Prof David Reich from Harvard Medical School in Boston, US, who led the research, told BBC News: “We estimate that about half the DNA of people in the Iron Age in Britain comes from these new migrants. What that means is if you trace back the ancestors of these Iron Age Britons 20 generations before the time they lived, half of them would not be living on the island of Great Britain.”
As for where the initial migrants originated in continental Europe, their closest matches are with ancient populations in France. But says Prof Reich, “We don’t yet have adequate sampling to directly confirm that or to see where exactly in France it would be.”
When the newcomers arrived, the existing British population traced most of its ancestry to people who arrived at the end of the Neolithic, around the time Stonehenge was being built. They were part of a tradition known as the Beaker Culture.
The later, mid- to late Bronze Age movement of people brought new cultural practices to the country. This included the intentional burial of multiple Bronze objects – known as hoards – perhaps as offerings to the gods.
The researchers also propose that the migrants and their descendants in Britain enabled the spread of Celtic languages (Celtic P/Brythonic ed).
Dr Lara Cassidy, an expert on ancient DNA from Trinity College Dublin, who was not involved with the latest study, called the findings “exciting”, adding: “It provides a potential opportunity for language change on the island.”
“Could this be the point at which the Celtic languages first enter the islands? I think the data presented here has moved the debate forward, however, it is far from conclusive.”
It’s not clear whether the migrants introduced this language group to Britain or were speaking just one type of Celtic. The branch of Celtic represented today by Irish and Scottish Gaelic – known as Goidelic – might already have been spoken by the existing inhabitants. Under this scenario, the newcomers may have spoken languages related to Welsh and Cornish – which belong to a different branch of Celtic known as Brythonic. (the name Caer-Ruthers comes from the Brythonc language ed)
Co-author Prof Sir Barry Cunliffe, from the school of archaeology at the University of Oxford, told BBC News: “If the Mid-Bronze Age move had any effect at all on language, then the simplest hypothesis would be to see it as a vector for introducing, or strengthening Brythonic,”
“If so, then Goidelic had to have arrived earlier, either with Beakers, or earlier.” (does this mead Goidelic/Celtic Q language originated in Britain but was phased out by the use of the Brythonic language? ed)
Also intriguing is the new study’s finding that there was a rapid increase – during the Iron Age – in the frequency of a gene variant for digesting raw milk, something that’s commonly known as lactose tolerance.
“It remains rare in Britain until the middle of the Iron Age, about 2,500 years ago. It’s incredibly recent in evolutionary terms. In order for it to have gone from nothing to almost everybody in that period of time, your ability to digest raw milk must have been life or death,” said Tom Booth.
“Adding to this whole craziness to some extent is that it becomes common in Britain 1,000 years before it becomes common elsewhere in Northern Europe.”
He added: “One of the leading possibilities is maybe that Britain went through a period of catastrophe like a famine or difficulty acquiring clean water sources. Then, what raw milk does is supply you with a clean source of hydration and food at the same time. Potentially, all you need are cows or sheep and you can make it through a disaster like that.”
The mass-movement of people to Britain took place against the background of similar upheaval on the continent which, to some extent, homogenised the genetic make-up of Europeans.
“In this period there’s convergence of ancestry throughout western and central Europe,” said Prof Reich.
“In general, though there were exceptions, northern populations become more genetically similar to southern populations. And the southern populations become somewhat genetically more similar to the northern populations.”
He said the exceptions were Scotland and the island of Sardinia, which were not as impacted by this North-South exchange.
Dr Cassidy said the prehistory of Britain and Ireland were closely intertwined, and that it was hard to understand one without the other. She said one of the obvious questions raised by this study was whether Ireland experienced a similar scale of inward migration during or after the Middle-Late Bronze Age.
“Characterising any differences in ancestry between Ireland and Britain during the Early Bronze Age will allow us to better understand the extent and direction of migration in subsequent periods.”
She added: “If Ireland shows a similar pattern to Scotland, in that we find little evidence of substantial inward migration following the Early Bronze Age, we have to ask how and when was Celtic language introduced to that island.”